Shu Meng Interviewed by China Daily on Red Sea Crisis
Publish time: 2023-12-26 Browsing times: 10

On December 26, 2023, Assistant Researcher Shu Meng of the Middle East Studies Institute of Shanghai International Studies University was interviewed byChina Daily on Red Sea Crisis(See China Daily, December 26, 2023, page 12)the full text of which is below:

US actions blamed for Red Sea crisis

Washington-led coalition may fuel further regional conflict, analysts say

The Red Sea crisis is an extension of the Palestine-Israel conflict, exacerbated by the United States' continuous support to Israel and its double standards in dealing with the Palestinian question, experts said, warning that a US-led Red Sea coalition may further fuel regional conflicts.

In recent weeks, Yemen's Houthi militia have intensified their attacks on Israel-linked ships passing the Red Sea, demanding an end to Israel's military actions in the Gaza Strip, and the delivery of food and medicines to the enclave.

This has led to major shipping and oil firms halting operations along this important trade route. The US has responded by initiating the so-called Operation Prosperity Guardian to safeguard commercial ships passing the Red Sea.

Shu Meng, an associate researcher at the Middle East Studies Institute of Shanghai International Studies University, identifies two key motives for the US actions.

First, the Red Sea is a vital maritime transport corridor, whose importance has been further highlighted by the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The security of transportation in this region is directly linked to US interests, she said.

Another motive is to protect Israel, as the Houthi militia's attacks are aimed at Israel, and protecting and supporting Israel has been a long-standing US policy in the Middle East, she added.

The coalition launched by the US means to serve its self-interest, catering to its Middle East policy of maintaining hegemony in the region by supporting Israel. However, now the US itself is unable to fully control the situation in the Red Sea, which is why it seeks to bind its allies and partners to join in this effort, said Sun Xihui, an associate research fellow with the National Institute of International Strategy at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Despite the US calling the Red Sea tensions an international challenge requiring a united response, the initial coalition support was limited, with only 10 nations, including Bahrain as the sole Arab state. The Pentagon later announced that 20 countries had joined the coalition, with Greece and Australia among the new members.

In a setback to the US, France, Spain, and Italy have declined their participation in the alliance.

Some countries, possibly including Arab states, have chosen not to disclose their participation to avoid backlash for supporting Israeli interests, according to a report from the Maritime Executive, a US news website.

This indicates that countries in the Middle East don't want to be deeply involved in the current Israel-Palestine conflict and will try their best to avoid the spillover effects of the conflict, said Shu.

No overt participation

The US, as an external power, wishes to completely dominate Middle Eastern affairs and drive Arab nations to serve and comply with US policies in the region. It aims to align these countries with its support for Israel against Hamas. Such policy objectives and strategies put many Middle Eastern countries in a dilemma, leading to the current situation where some refuse to join the coalition and others, even if they join the US team, are unwilling to do so publicly, Sun added.

The US announcement of its formation of the military coalition has drawn a fierce response from the Houthis, who said the US move would not stop their attacks on Israel-bound commercial ships and vowed to retaliate by targeting US battleships and interests in the region if they were attacked.

The US move may lead to a further spilling over of the Gaza conflict, with other organizations possibly launching more attacks in or around the Red Sea, which would increase uncertainty in the Red Sea shipping routes, raise transportation costs, and mount greater pressure on the global supply chain, said Shu.

The US-led coalition is not addressing the root cause of the Red Sea crisis. The Palestine-Israel conflict is the fundamental reason behind the escalating situation in the Red Sea. The US refuses to support a cease-fire between Israel and Palestine while blindly pulling its allies into the coalition will only escalate the situation, said Sun.

Source: China Daily

(The views expressed in this article are the personal views of the author or the interviewee, and do not represent the position of this research institution)